Category: Trump effect

April 9, 2019

 

Sunday night, we learned that distaff Goebbels, Kirstjen Nielsen was forced to resign by Trump for the crime of being “insufficiently brutal,” (“Kirstjen Nielsen Enforced Cruelty at the Border.  Her Replacement Could Be Worse,” by The Editorial Board, The New York Times, 4/8/19).  Consider for a moment what it means that the person responsible for the family separation policy that ripped 3000 children from their parents and placed them in cages; the person responsible for detaining migrants in facilities so frigid that the migrants call  them “hieleras,” (iceboxes); the person apparently undisturbed by the deaths of 22 immigrants in CPB custody over the past two years , was not cruel enough.

As the day unfolded, it became clear that the source of Trump’s rage was Nielsen’s apparent unwillingness to flagrantly break the law, rather than merely skirt it.  Nielsen may have been a callous, gaslighting racist functionary, but her ouster was merely the first of many dominoes to fall in what is clearly a purge designed to leave a hollowed out Department of Homeland Security with only powerless Trump toadies at the helm.  By Monday’s end, Trump had fired Secret Service Director Randolph Alles, in the process being sure to leak the derisive nickname he gave Alles because of his physical appearance.  The leak was strategically designed to obscure the revelation that  not only did Yujing Zhang attempt to bring four cellphones and a “thumb drive infected with malware” into Mar-a-lago, but that she also had nine USB drives, 5 sim cards and a device to detect hidden cameras in her room (Source:  “Chinese Woman Arrested at Mar-a-Lago Had a Hidden Camera Detector, Prosecutors Say,” by Frances Robles, The New York Times, 4/8/19). Continue reading “Incipient genocide”

    All week the press has been gleefully covering the growing list of accusations that former Vice President Joe Biden has a habit of being inappropriately physical and affectionate in a way that makes women uncomfortable.  Lucy Flores opened the floodgates with her piece one week ago, describing how Biden grabbed her shoulders and kissed her hair in a manner she called, “blatantly inappropriate and unnerving,” (Source: “An Awkward Kiss Changed How I Saw Joe Biden,” by Lucy Flores, TheCut.com, 3/29/19).

    Flores’ story unleashed a flood of similar anecdotes, accompanied by photo montages showing Biden nuzzling noses and giving impromptu shoulder massages to an array of women (and some men).  Despite all of the hand wringing, this isn’t complicated — don’t touch people who don’t want to be touched. The truth is, this is just Biden being Biden— an exuberant and often inappropriate, if fundamentally decent man.   Continue reading “All politics is local”

April 2, 2019

Los Angeles and the broader hip-hop community were left reeling by the senseless, cold-blooded execution of rapper and entrepreneur, Nipsey Hussle, on Sunday.  Hussle was killed outside of his Marathon Clothing store in broad daylight, (Source:  “Grammy-Nominated Rapper Nipsey Hussle Shot and Killed at 33,” by the Associated Press, The New York Times, 3/31/19).  Hussle, born Ermias Asghedom, was a loving father of two and a loving partner to Lauren London, mother of his youngest child, (Source:  “Rest In Power, Neighborhood Nip,” by Panama Jackson, Verysmartbrothas.theroot.com, 4/1/19).

Article after article showcased Hussle’s entrepreneurial spirit, detailing how he sold limited edition mixtapes for $100, rather than sign with a major label. Just last year, Hussle opened up Vector 90, a co-working space and STEM center in South Central.  In Hussle’s words, “In our culture, there’s a narrative that says, ‘Follow the athletes, follow the entertainers.’ And that’s cool, but there should be something that says, ‘follow Elon Musk, follow Zuckerberg,” (Source:  “With a new STEM Center and a revolutionary marketing strategy, Nipsey Hussle is music’s biggest disruptor,” by Sonaiya Kelley, The Los Angeles Times, 3/16/18). Continue reading “RIP Nipsey Hussle”

March 28, 2019

 

In the last forty-eight hours, the news media has been consumed with the latest developments in the Jussie Smollett case.  On Tuesday, prosecutors dropped all of the charges against him and sealed his record, apparently in exchange for Smollett’s forfeiture of his $10,000 bond and doing sixteen hours of community service, (Source:  “Why the prosecutors dismissed the charges against Jussie Smollett,” by Deanna Paul, The Washington Post, 3/28/19).  Countless hours were devoted to venting anger over the speculation that Smollett had gotten away with something. The Chicago Police Department was furious and Mayor Rahm Emanuel declared the case disposition a “whitewash.”

Their performance is proof positive that irony is dead.  We should believe that the same Chicago Police Department that operated a secret facility from 1974-1991, where Police Commander Jon Burge tortured Black men in order to extract confessions from them, is outraged at this supposed miscarriage of justice?(Source:  “A Digital Archive Documents Two Decades of Torture by Chicago Police,” by Juleyka Lantigua-Williams, TheAtlantic.com, 10/26/16).  We should believe that Rahm Emanuel, who buried the video of the murder of Laquan McDonald by Chicago Police Officer Jason Van Dyke for a year, is an advocate for greater transparency? (Source:  “Laquan McDonald was shot down by the police, and he took the mayor’s career down with him,” by Dahleen Glanton, The Chicago Tribune,  9/6/18). Continue reading “Whitewash?”

March 26, 2019

 

We have all been sitting in stunned silence since the Mueller report landed with a thud, wondering how two years of investigations could have ended like this.  Mueller maintained his monk-like silence, content to deliver his confidential report to Attorney General Bill Barr, a reliable Republican hatchet man with a reputation for erasing Republican scandals.  True to form, Barr condensed an 87 page report into a four page summary which never quoted a complete sentence from Mueller, but managed to definitively state that there was no evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government and to conclude that, in his own judgement, Trump had not obstructed justice, (Source:  “4 things we learned from Barr’s summary of the Mueller report,” by Daniel Bush, PBSNewshour.org, 3/24/19).

Those of us who foolishly pinned all of our hopes on Mueller delivering the coup de grace to this lawless, wildly unfit charlatan were left deflated.  Yet, rank speculation aside, there is no way to know from the snippet taken out of context what doomed a collusion finding. The only way to really know what Mueller concluded is to read the actual report in its entirety. Proof that the truth is far more complicated than Barr would have you believe is evident in how quickly McConnell blocked Chuck Schumer’s effort to release the full report, (Source:  “McConnell blocks Schumer effort to call for public release of Mueller report,” by Rebecca Shabad and Frank Thorp V, NBCNews.com, 3/25/19). Continue reading “Slow motion coup”

March 24, 2019

    Friday at 5:00 p.m.  the news broke that Special Counsel Robert Mueller had delivered his final report to Attorney General William Barr.  In his letter to Congress, Barr stated that he “remained committed to as much transparency as possible,” and that he could brief them on the report’s “principal conclusions” as soon as this weekend, (Source:  “Mueller Delivers Report on Trump-Russia Investigation to Attorney General,” by Sharon LaFraniere and Katie Benner, The New York Times, 3/22/19).

    Despite the complete lack of any actual knowledge of the contents of the report, the news media felt compelled to report on this bombshell news.  Word from an anonymous senior Justice Department official that no further indictments would be forthcoming fueled speculation that Mueller’s final report could be a “massive boon”  to Trump.  Once again, the press defaulted to lazy sports world analogies, without having seen so much as a syllable of the actual report themselves. Continue reading “Us”

March 20, 2019

    While we were still reeling from the aftershock of the racist terrorist attack in New Zealand, or busily grabbing our popcorn to watch the Twitter feud between Trump and Kellyanne Conway’s husband, George Conway, the Supreme Court issued a ruling that may have flown under the radar.  Nielsen v. Preap is an ominous sign of how each branch of government is contributing to a two-tiered white supremacist society, with insurmountable barriers for Black and Brown people.

      In Nielsen v. Preap, the Court ruled, by a 5-4 majority, that ICE could detain immigrants indefinitely, without bond, if they had previously been convicted of a crime.  In the case at hand, the respondent, Mony Preap, was a lawful permanent resident with two drug convictions. Although Preap was released from custody for those offenses in 2006, ICE used them as the rationale for his apprehension in 2013, seven years later, after Preap was released from jail following an arrest, (Source:  Nielsen v. Preap, 586 U.S.___ (2019)). Continue reading “Choose wisely”

    Three days after the massacre of 50 people at a mosque in Christchurch, New Zealand, by a white supremacist terrorist, we remain numb with shock and horror.  We are sickened by the act itself, as well as by the canny way the murderer harnessed modern media to amplify his message of hate, uploading his 74 page “manifesto” to the internet and outfitting himself with a body camera in order to stream the carnage in real time, (Source:  “A Mass Murder of, and for, the Internet,” by Kevin Roose, The New York Times, 3/15/19).

     The footage went viral before people could fully process what they were watching.  Images of men, women and children being senselessly slaughtered while in the midst of Jumu’ah will be seared in the consciousness of the countless people who clicked unthinkingly on the retweets and shares that raced ahead of the social media platforms’ efforts to take them down. Continue reading “White supremacy—our greatest global threat”

March 13, 2019

 

Yesterday’s news was dominated by the announcement of the indictment of 50 people in a massive criminal operation by which wealthy and prominent parents cheated and bribed their children’s way into elite schools, including Stanford, U.S.C., Georgetown and Yale.  The unsealed indictment announced by the U.S. Attorney in Boston detailed a complex scheme that involved cheating on standardized tests (after claiming a disability to obtain extra time); lying about participation and achievement in sports such as crew, tennis, soccer and water polo; and bribing college coaches to falsely state that the students were being recruited, (Source:  “College Admissions Scandal:  Actresses, Business Leaders and Other Wealthy Parents Charged,” by Jennifer Medina, Katie Benner and Kate Taylor, The New York Times, 3/12/19).

It is hard to even know where to begin in cataloguing the myriad ways in which this sprawling scheme is enraging.  There is the fact that parents invented athletic records, making a mockery of the thousands of parents who placed a racket or a bat in their toddler’s hands and spent the next fifteen years shuttling them to farflung games and tournaments chasing the dream of recruitment by a top college or university, in order to secure their children’s future.  Then there is the fact that the vehicle for the payments to cheating standardized test proctors and lying college coaches was a nonprofit foundation, giving these wealthy reprobates tax deductible criminality. Continue reading “The myth of meritocracy”

March 11, 2019

 

Late last week, the dramatic injustice of our “justice” system was once again made evident by the extraordinarily light sentence meted out to Paul Manafort by Judge T.S. Ellis of the Eastern District of Virginia.  Diverging wildly from the sentencing guidelines, which recommend 19-24 years, Ellis sentenced Manafort to a mere 47 months, citing his “otherwise blameless life” as a rationale, (Source:  “The ‘Otherwise Blameless’ Life of Paul Manafort,” by Franklin Foer, TheAtlantic.com, 3/7/19).  As Franklin Foer and others have detailed, far from leading a blameless life, Manafort made a career lobbying for brutal authoritarians, bilking both his erstwhile business partners and banks and lying about all of it to save his sorry hide.  In addition, Manafort displayed none of the contrition that is normally a precondition for a lenient sentence.

None of that mattered, as Judge Ellis seemed eager to help Manafort evade responsibility.  Compare that with the sentence that Judge Ellis handed down to African American Congressman William Jefferson in 2009.  Jefferson, who was convicted of bribery and arrested with $90,000 in cash in his freezer, was sentenced to 13 years in prison, (Source:  “Paul Manafort’s Sentencing Produced One Last Awful Thing,” by Charles P. Pierce, Esquire.com, 3/8/19). Manafort’s light sentence is merely the latest in a long line of travesties proving that there are two sets of rules in this country depending on your race. Continue reading “Freedom is elusive”